The ATF has been busy lately. Over the past several months, a significant package of NFA-related regulatory changes has moved through the system — some already final, others still in the proposal stage. I want to walk through what's actually changed, what's still pending, and what it means for you as an NFA owner or someone considering acquiring regulated firearms.
Some of these changes are already final and in effect. Others are still proposed rules — meaning current law and existing ATF procedures still apply until those proposals are finalized. I'll be clear about which is which throughout. Don't change how you're doing things based on a proposed rule that hasn't been published as final.
The $200 Transfer Tax Has Been Reduced to $0 for Certain Items
This one is already final, and it's a meaningful change. ATF has issued a final rule conforming its regulations to statutory changes that reduce the NFA making and transfer tax to $0 for certain NFA firearms — specifically suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and certain other regulated items.
Machine guns and destructive devices are not included. Those remain subject to different treatment.
The tax is reduced — but the registration process is not eliminated. You still go through the full ATF application and approval process before making or receiving a regulated item. The compliance obligations remain. The financial cost just changed.
Proposed: Interstate Transport of NFA Firearms
This one is still a proposal — so don't change your travel habits yet. But it's worth understanding because, if finalized, it would make everyday NFA ownership considerably less burdensome for people who move around.
Under the proposal, temporary transportation of lawfully registered NFA firearms for 365 days or fewer would no longer require advance notice to ATF or prior approval before travel. For longer-term transportation or permanent relocation, notice would still be required — but you wouldn't have to wait for ATF approval before moving.
That's a real quality-of-life improvement for anyone who competes, hunts across state lines, maintains property in multiple states, or is relocating. The streamlined process would apply only where the firearm is properly registered in the NFRTR, transportation is lawful under applicable federal, state, and local law, and you carry appropriate proof of registration.
Until this is final, continue following current requirements.
Proposed: Joint Spousal Registration
This is the one I've had the most questions about, because people want to know whether it makes NFA trusts unnecessary. The short answer is no.
The proposal would allow married couples to file joint applications as makers or transferees of NFA firearms, and transfers between spouses would not count as separate NFA transfers. ATF also included provisions addressing what happens in cases of separation or divorce — which tells you something about the complexity this would introduce into what people assume is a simple situation.
Here's how I think about it: joint spousal registration, if finalized, creates a new option. It doesn't replace what a trust does. If you want an adult child, sibling, or close friend to legally access your NFA items, a trust covers that — joint spousal registration wouldn't. If you're thinking about what happens when you're incapacitated or when you die, a trust addresses those questions more completely. For a married couple with a single item and no succession concerns, joint registration might work fine. For most of my clients, it doesn't replace what a trust provides.
Proposed: Removing the CLEO Notification Requirement
ATF has proposed removing the requirement that applicants provide copies of NFA application materials to the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in their locality. If this becomes final, the application process gets simpler — all other registration, background check, and approval requirements stay in place, just without the CLEO copy step.
Worth knowing, particularly for applicants in jurisdictions where CLEO notification has been an irritant. Not final yet.
Final Rule: Stabilizing Braces
ATF has issued a final rule rescinding the regulatory language associated with the prior stabilizing brace rule. This follows extensive litigation and a series of court decisions that significantly limited enforcement of the earlier rule. The final rule removes the relevant regulatory language and aligns ATF's regulations with where the courts have landed.
What this doesn't do is give you a blanket answer that braces are legal in all configurations. Whether a particular firearm falls under the NFA still depends on the actual configuration, applicable statutory definitions, and federal, state, and local law. If you have questions about a specific firearm, that's worth a conversation before you assume you're in the clear.
Final Rule: Bump Stocks and the Machine Gun Definition
Effective May 6, 2026, ATF issued a final rule removing the regulatory language that had incorporated bump stocks into the definition of "machine gun." This follows the Supreme Court's decision in Garland v. Cargill, which held that semiautomatic rifles equipped with bump stocks do not meet the statutory definition of a machine gun under federal law. ATF is conforming its regulations to what the Court decided.
What This Means for Your NFA Trust
Taken together, these changes reduce some administrative friction — and that's genuinely good news. The $0 tax is real and already in effect. The proposed simplifications to interstate transport and CLEO notification, if they're finalized, will make day-to-day NFA ownership less cumbersome.
None of that changes the core reasons to have a properly drafted trust. A trust is still worth having if you:
- Want a spouse, adult child, or other trusted person to legally possess your NFA items
- Want to plan for what happens if you're incapacitated or when you die
- Own multiple regulated items and want a clear legal structure around them
- Want to reduce the risk of accidental unlawful possession by family members
- Want to integrate NFA items into a broader estate plan
My Guidance: Don't make buying, transferring, or transport decisions based on proposed rules that haven't been finalized. Verify where any given rule actually stands before you act. And if your situation has changed — new spouse, new state, more items — it's worth reviewing whether your current ownership structure still makes sense. That's exactly the kind of conversation I have with clients regularly.
Related reading: the comment windows on ATF's full 34-rule package closed in early August 2026 — for what happens next (comment review, final rules in waves, effective dates, and near-certain litigation), see The Final Comment Window Is Closing on ATF's 34-Rule Package. Here's What Happens Next.
Related Articles
If Federal NFA Registration Goes Away, Your State Law Decides Whether You Are a Felon
A number of states make a suppressor or short-barreled firearm lawful only if it is registered, licensed, permitted, or otherwise authorized under federal law. Strip out the federal registration and those statutes do not disappear — they become unconditional bans. A 50-state survey of the drafting, why “the state law is moot” is the wrong answer, and why the Gun Control Act keeps short-barreled firearms gated even for buyers the injunction covers.
Maryland's "Glock Ban" and the NRA v. Moore Lawsuit: What SB 334 Actually Does
Maryland's SB 334 bans most Glock-style pistols starting January 1, 2027 — but current owners are grandfathered. What the law actually does, which pistols are affected, and where the NRA v. Moore lawsuit stands.
$0 NFA Tax: Do You Still Need a Gun Trust?
The NFA tax stamp is now $0, and a proposed rule may let spouses skip the trust. What changed, what's still proposed, and when a gun trust still makes sense.