All Resources

Regulatory Update

$0 NFA Tax: Do You Still Need a Gun Trust?

7 min readUpdated June 2026For educational purposes only — not legal advice
By Russell Roby, Esq.Last updated June 2026

Since January 1, 2026, I've gotten some version of this question almost every week: "The tax stamp is free now, and I hear a spouse won't even need a trust anymore — so why would I pay for one?" It's a fair question, and I'm not going to give you a self-serving answer. The law genuinely changed, and for some people the math really has shifted. But a lot of what's circulating online conflates two very different things, and at least one of them isn't actually law yet. Let me separate them.

NFA / Gun Trust Update

Last reviewed June 2026. Several of the rules discussed here are proposed, not final. The $0 tax stamp is settled law; the spousal-registration, CLEO, and transport changes are still moving through rulemaking. I update this page as they move — but always confirm the current status before you act.

What Actually Changed (This Is Real, and It's in Effect)

The NFA making and transfer tax is gone for most items. As of January 1, 2026, that tax dropped to $0. The $0 tax applies to suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and AOWs; machine guns and destructive devices remain subject to the $200 tax.

Two things to keep straight about it:

  • It came from Congress, through the 2025 reconciliation law — not from the ATF. It's already in effect and isn't waiting on any rulemaking.
  • It cut the cost, not the process. You still file the form, still undergo the background check, still register the item, and still wait for approval. Machine guns and destructive devices were not included in the change.

So the $200 line item that used to sit on top of every can or SBR is simply gone. Good news, full stop.

What Might Change (This Is Proposed, and It Is Not Law Yet)

On April 29, 2026, the DOJ and ATF announced a large package of NFA rule revisions — 34 of them. A handful matter to suppressor and SBR owners, and one is the source of the "you won't need a trust" talk:

  • Joint spousal registration. The proposal would let married couples jointly register an NFA item on a Form 4 (or Form 1) without forming a trust, so a transfer between spouses wouldn't count as a separate NFA transfer.
  • CLEO notification would be eliminated.
  • Form 5320.20 would no longer be required for short-term (365 days or fewer) interstate transport of an NFA firearm.
  • A separate interstate-transport proposal would extend FOPA-style protection to routine travel stops (gas, food, lodging).

Here's the part the headlines skip: these are proposed rules. They went out for public comment, the ATF still has to review comments and publish final rules, and until that happens they have no legal effect. As of now, if a married couple wants joint possession, a trust is still the mechanism. Don't restructure your plans around a rule that doesn't legally exist yet.

Confirm the Current Status

Before you rely on anything here, confirm the current status of these rules. The $0 tax stamp is settled law. The spousal-registration, CLEO, and transport changes are proposed and still moving through rulemaking — they may be revised, finalized on a delayed schedule, or challenged. Check where each rule actually stands today before making a decision based on it.

The Honest Part: Where the Calculus Really Has Shifted

I'll say plainly what some attorneys won't: if your only reason for a trust was the $200 cost or letting your spouse use the can, the case for a trust is weaker than it was a year ago. The cost barrier is gone today, and the proposed spousal rule — if it's finalized as written — would handle the narrow husband-and-wife scenario directly. The ATF itself noted that many of the spousal trusts it sees are really just substitutes for joint registration.

If that's your entire situation — one item, you and your spouse, no one else — it's reasonable to wait and watch how the spousal rule lands before paying anyone to draft anything.

Where a Trust Still Wins

For a lot of owners, though, none of this touches the actual reasons to have a trust:

  • More than a spouse. A trust lets adult children, a shooting partner, or other co-trustees legally possess and use the item on their own, without you present. The spousal rule covers exactly one other person — your spouse — and no one else.
  • Estate planning and inheritance. A trust can provide clearer instructions for who may possess the items, who receives them, and how they should be handled after death. Form 5 tax-free transfers may be available for lawful inheritance, but a trust can reduce confusion and keep the plan organized.
  • It works now. A trust is settled, available, and operative today. The spousal rule is a proposal that may or may not arrive, and may not arrive in the form people expect.
  • Multiple items and continuity. If you're building a collection, a single trust governs all of it and outlives any single registration.

Bottom Line: The $0 stamp is real and already saving you money — enjoy it. The "spouses won't need a trust" rule is proposed, not law, so don't act as though it's already here. And if your needs go beyond a single spouse sharing a single can — co-trustees, kids, a collection, or a clean plan for passing things on — a trust still does work that neither the tax change nor the proposed rule addresses. If you're not sure which camp you're in, that's a five-minute conversation. I'll tell you honestly whether you need a trust or whether you'd be smarter to wait.

This article is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. NFA and firearms laws vary by state and change frequently. Consult a qualified attorney before making any legal decisions.

Have Questions About Your Situation?

A 30-minute consultation can save you years of headaches — and keep your family out of legal trouble.

Free Consultation

Responds within ~1 business day